Coverage Gate
Each mandatory check carries its own capability, evaluation and evidence state. A “ready” verdict is structurally impossible while any required row is uncovered — the tool cannot silently skip a rule.
Audit engine live in production — not a mock-up
Compliance is
a build step.
Every IFC version checked automatically — the way software teams run tests before a release. Applicant-side, IFC-native, and every verdict carries its own evidence.
WebGL 3D IFC4 Model
Interactive
01 — Problem
Code compliance is where
building projects stall.
The check is manual, the codes move faster than the engineers, and the cost lands on the applicant.
$75K
soft-cost hit per residential project from permit delayNAHB estimate — $30–75K range
83%
of developers name permit delay a top barrier to delivery
89%
of Swedish permit applications arrive incomplete on first submission
3–5days
of a senior engineer per document set, cross-checking codes by hand
02 — 3D Spatial Audit
IFC Geometry & Real-Time
Laser Scanning Plane.
Interactive 3D WebGL inspection engine. The elevation scanner plane passes continuously through architectural, structural, and MEP domain layers, evaluating building entity attributes in real time.
03 — Multi-Agent Consensus
18 Autonomous Reviewers &
Live Stream Audit.
Watch 18 domain-specialized AI reviewers stream proof-carrying verdicts directly into the submission document set in real time — forming structural consensus across all building codes.
01
Fire Safety EI60
BBR 5:611 · PASS
02
Accessibility Route
EN 17210 · 1350mm
03
Means of Egress
BBR 5:321 · 27.4m
04
Structural Load
EN 1991 · C3 Pass
05
Ramp Gradient
BBR 3:146 · 1:11 CHECK
06
Acoustics Sound
SS 25267 · 52dB
07
MEP Ventilation
EN 13779 · 6.2 m/s
08
Daylight Glazing
BBR 6:32 · DF 1.2%
09
Water & Drainage
BBR 6:62 · Compliant
CHAPTER 5 — FIRE & EGRESS COMPLIANCE SPECIFICATION
104
5.611 Fire Separation: All EI 60 rated walls shall extend continuously to slab undersides.
PASS
105
17210 Accessible Corridor: Clear width measured along main route is 1350mm (Min 1200mm).
PASS
106
3.146 Ramp Slopes: Ramp 3B gradient is 1:11 (8.9%). Landing length requires review.
CHECK
107
5.321 Travel Distance: Maximum egress path length to safest stairwell: 27.4 meters.
PASS
108
13779 Air Clearance: Duct velocity is 6.2 m/s; structural clearance 450mm maintained.
PASS
109
Coverage Gate Status: 18/18 Domain Reviewers active · Coverage Gate 98%.
GATE READY
10
Ceiling Clearance
BBR 3:22 · 2700mm
11
Electrical Mains
SS 4364000 · Verified
12
Moisture Barrier
BBR 6:5 · Sealed
13
Elevators & Lifts
EN 81-20 · Pass
14
Emergency Signs
BBR 5:34 · Illuminated
15
Parking & EV
PBL 8:9 · 20% Ready
16
Material Specs
REACH · No Lead
17
Energy Performance
EPBD · Class A+
18
BIM Provenance
ISO 19650 · Proven
04 — Visual Collages
Multi-domain IFC Collages
& Evidence Layers.
From raw architectural CAD and IFC geometry to correlated rule execution. Every finding connects back to its precise source in the model.
EN 17210
EI 60
Gradient
Full-Spectrum Building Audit Collage
Overlays live IFC data structures, 3D structural analysis, and municipal building codes onto unified compliance maps.
01 Architectural Render
02 Structural Steel Frame
03 MEP HVAC Piping
Cross-Domain Join Engine
Types joins across architecture, structural engineering, and MEP routing. Finds clashes and code violations before construction starts.
05 — Solution
Continuous integration
for buildings.
Two mechanisms make the verdict trustworthy. Both are patent pending.
Proof-carrying correlation
Cross-domain findings are typed joins over IFC entities with a provenance trail back to source facts — so a finding can be re-derived, not just trusted.
Bitemporal source closure
Codes move: national, state and municipal amendments land continuously. Any past review can be replayed against the rules as they stood on the submission date.
01IFC / PDF in
02Jurisdiction rule pack
0318 domain reviewers
04Coverage gate
05Evidence pack
06 — Proof
Validated on a real project.
Not a sandbox.
manual review
3–5 days
measured with BIM Grade
2–4 hours
- 24 sections of documentation in scope, mandatory state review
- Paid, externally-contracted project documentation — real client work
- 3 U.S. provisional applications filed 19 Jul 2026 on the core mechanisms
- Sweden first — BBR + PBL, applicant-side pre-submission — then DACH, then US
07 — Market
The category tipped.
Penetration is still ~2%.
Capital and regulation arrived in 2026; the installed base did not. That gap is the entry window.
≈2%of ~19,000 U.S. municipalities run any AI plan review
$54Mraised by PermitFlow — investors already priced the category
900Kmonthly users on UpCodes — the audience is already online
6mo→6dreview cycle compression reported by early-adopter cities
08 — Competition
Everyone owns one column.
Nobody owns the row.
“Upload a PDF and let AI find code violations” is a crowded lane. Neutral IFC plus jurisdiction replay is not.
| Tool | IFC-native | Code corpus | Applicant-side | Cross-jurisdiction | Provable coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solibri / BIMcollab BIM QA, rules you author yourself | ● | · | ● | · | · |
| UpCodes / Helonic code content + PDF reading | · | ● | ● | · | · |
| Kestrel strong, but Revit-only | · | ● | ● | · | · |
| CodeComply / CivCheck sells to city halls, not firms | · | ● | · | · | · |
| AiTech (SE) Sweden — municipality-facing | · | ● | · | · | · |
| BIM Grade the whole row | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● |
Fragmentation is the moat — there is no single global building code, and that is exactly why a jurisdiction-replay engine compounds.
Check your next
submission set.
Applicant-side pre-submission review. Sweden (BBR + PBL) available now; DACH and US rule packs in build.